Boundary disputes, the basicsFrom the survey that finds the problem to the recorded line that ends it
The steps in order: the survey evidence first, then the three ways Virginia law lets a disputed line be settled, the fence statutes that run alongside, and the narrow 2026 right to enter a neighbor's land for repairs.
A fence goes in, and a current survey comes before the argument
Picture a new fence going in along a line two neighbors read differently. One owner walks it from an old corner, the other from a deed description, and the posts land a few feet apart from where either expected. Boundary disputes of that kind are argued from records, and the first record that matters is a current boundary survey.
Establishing or reestablishing land boundaries, and locating physical improvements, are part of the practice of land surveying under Va. Code 54.1-400. The surveyor licensing board's rule for a land boundary survey, 18VAC10-20-370, requires the surveyor to search the land records for the proper description of the land being surveyed and for the description of the adjoining land as it pertains to the common boundaries, then to compare the evidence found from all known sources, including evidence found in the field.
The professional must clearly identify on the plats, maps, and reports inconsistencies found in the research of common boundaries between the land being surveyed and the adjoining land.
18VAC10-20-370
That note on the plat puts a conflict between the two record descriptions on paper. How the fieldwork and the research are carried out, and how a current survey differs from a plat compiled from older papers, is covered in how land surveys work.
Written intent, and the markers that witness it
Once the records and the field evidence are in hand, the work is reconciling them: the written description in a deed or plat, such as a metes and bounds description with its bearings, distances and calls to monuments, against the markers found on the ground.
When a new plat and an old deed read differently, how VDOT's survey guidance frames that reconciliation, and what each piece of evidence counts for, is taken up in what happens when the survey and the deed disagree.
On a lot under two acres, the survey already in a file may be a physical improvements survey under 18VAC10-20-380, which has rules of its own for fences near the line and for improvements that cross it. A shed or a fence that sits across the line is an encroachment, and what follows when a survey shows one is its own question.
An agreement, an approved plat or a deed that vacates a lot line
Neighbors who can agree on where the line should be have more than one way to settle it without a lawsuit, and each carries its own limits.
A boundary line agreement under Va. Code 15.2-2201
The definition of subdivision in Va. Code 15.2-2201 keeps a local subdivision ordinance from precluding a boundary line agreement between owners of adjacent parcels, but only one used to resolve a bona fide property line dispute and kept inside the statute's limits. What those limits are, and whether a particular agreement fits them, is worked through in what a boundary line agreement is and when Virginia law allows one; drafting it, and whether and how it is recorded, are an attorney's work.
A lot line moved by plat or vacated by deed
Under Va. Code 15.2-2275 a locality may provide in its subdivision ordinance that lot lines may be vacated, relocated or otherwise altered as part of a valid, properly recorded plat of subdivision or resubdivision. That action may not relocate streets, alleys, easements for public passage or other public areas, and no easement or utility right of way may be relocated or altered without the express consent of everyone holding an interest in it. Alternatively, a locality may allow lot lines to be vacated by a recorded deed providing that no easements or utility rights of way along the vacated lines are extinguished or altered without the express consent of all persons holding any interest in them. The deed must be approved in writing on its face by the governing body or its designee and must reference the recorded plat that created the line.
Carroll County's posted subdivision ordinance, dated April 14, 2014, has a device of its own, the boundary line adjustment, set beside the agreement in the boundary line agreement glossary entry. That ordinance says an adjustment is not a subdivision but requires the Agent, the county's subdivision agent, to review and approve its plat before it is recorded. The county's current Land Use and Planning page, by contrast, treats every division of a lot or parcel as a subdivision. Whether that plat review still applies when neighbors settle a line by an agreement under the state language, and what the current ordinance says, are questions for Carroll County Land Use and Planning, 276-730-3008.
A judgment in the deed book binds the parties and their heirs, devisees and assigns
When neighbors cannot agree, a Virginia statute lets a person with a subsisting interest in land and a right to its possession ask the court to ascertain and designate the true boundary line with one or more adjoining owners.
The court may appoint a surveyor and order whatever surveys it considers necessary, with the costs assessed as the court directs. What the judgment does is spelled out in the same article.
The judgment of the court shall be recorded in the current deed book of the court. The judgment shall forever settle, determine, and designate the true boundary line or lines in question, between the parties, their heirs, devisees, and assigns.
Code of Virginia, Title 8.01, Chapter 3, Article 16
A boundary case can also meet a claim of ownership by possession, which has its own elements and its own rule for a line first set by mistake, all set out in adverse possession basics.
Whether to file, and which evidence controls a given line, are decisions for each owner's attorney. Whether a title insurance policy responds to a boundary problem is a question for the title insurer that issued it.
Who builds and repairs the fence between two tracts
Virginia's division fence statutes run on their own track. Adjoining landowners build and maintain division fences between their lands at joint and equal expense, unless one of them chooses to let his land lie open or they agree otherwise.
Notice to build
If no division fence has been built, either owner may give the other written notice of his intention to build one and require the other to build his half.
Ten days to answer
The notified owner may, within 10 days, give written notice that he intends to let his land lie open.
Thirty days to agree
If he gives no such notice and does not agree within 30 days to build his half, he is liable to the builder for one-half of the expense.
A fence out of repair
Once a division fence is so far out of repair that it is no longer a lawful fence, either owner may give written notice requiring the other to repair his half. After 30 days without that repair, the notifying owner may repair the entire fence to make it a lawful fence, and the other owner is liable for one-half of the expense.
Neighbors can agree otherwise, and the Code says when such a deal outlasts them. An agreement about building or maintaining the division fence binds successors in title only if it is in writing and specifically says so, is recorded in the deed book in the clerk's office of the county where the land lies, and is properly indexed as deeds must be. The fence statutes decide who pays for a fence; where the line runs is still the survey's question, and the court's if it comes to that.
The 2026 right of entry reaches repairs, not corner hunting
A structure built close to a line sometimes cannot be repaired from its owner's side. Va. Code 55.1-304.1, enacted in 2026, gives a narrow court route for that situation.
When an owner seeks to repair or maintain the exterior of a structure he owns, the work is impossible without entering the adjoining property, and permission has been denied or unreasonable conditions have been placed on the entry, the owner may petition the circuit court for a right of entry. After the petition is served and a hearing is held, and on a finding that the owner made a good faith effort to get permission, the court may grant entry on such terms as justice requires, including a bond.
Such an entry is not a trespass. The petitioning owner must still return the adjoining property to its previous condition and is liable for actual damages caused by the entry. The section speaks only to repairing or maintaining the exterior of a structure; it is not a route for walking a neighbor's land to look for corners or to run a survey.
Ask about a disputed line
Send a few details and Lowell will come back with an honest read. No cost, no obligation.
Got it. Thank you.
We'll be in touch shortly with an honest read.
Good questions, straight answers.
Can I pull up a survey pin I believe was set in the wrong spot?
Not without risk. Under Va. Code 18.2-137, unlawfully damaging or removing a boundary marker, without intent to steal, is a crime that runs from a Class 3 misdemeanor up to a Class 6 felony, depending on who does it and the value or damage involved. Whether a pin is misplaced is a land surveyor's question, and whether removing it would be unlawful is an attorney's.
Does my neighbor have to split the cost of a new fence on the line?
Not always. Adjoining landowners build and maintain division fences at joint and equal expense unless one of them chooses to let his land lie open or they agree otherwise. After written notice that you intend to build, the neighbor may answer in writing within 10 days that he will let his land lie open. If he neither does that nor agrees within 30 days to build his half, he is liable to the builder for one-half of the expense.
Once a court fixes the boundary, can a later owner reopen it?
Not as between the parties and those who take after them. Under Virginia's boundary line statute the judgment is recorded in the current deed book of the court and forever settles, determines and designates the true boundary line in question between the parties, their heirs, devisees and assigns. Whether a later dispute involves someone who was not bound by that judgment is a question for an attorney to read against the case record.
Where this page's facts come from
Every rule, office and figure above traces to one of these. Rules change; check the office before you act on one.
- Va. Code 54.1-400: the practice of land surveying Virginia General Assembly
- 18VAC10-20-370: land boundary surveys (research, inconsistencies, compiled plats) Board for Architects, Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, Certified Interior Designers and Landscape Architects
- 18VAC10-20-380: physical improvements surveys (fences, crossings, when a boundary survey is warranted) Board for Architects, Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, Certified Interior Designers and Landscape Architects
- VDOT Survey Manual, Chapter 4: boundary retracement, monuments, record bearings and distances Virginia Department of Transportation
- Va. Code 55.1-703: residential property disclosure statement, current lot lines and a property survey Virginia General Assembly
- Va. Code 18.2-137: injuring a boundary memorial or marked tree Virginia General Assembly
- Va. Code 15.2-2201: the subdivision definition and boundary line agreements Virginia General Assembly
- Va. Code 15.2-2275: vacating, relocating or altering lot lines by plat or deed Virginia General Assembly
- Subdivision Ordinance, April 14, 2014 (boundary line adjustment) Carroll County, Virginia
- Code of Virginia, Title 8.01, Chapter 3, Article 16: establishing boundary lines Virginia General Assembly
- Code of Virginia, Title 55.1, Chapter 28: division fences Virginia General Assembly
- Va. Code 55.1-304.1: entry onto adjoining property for repairs or maintenance Virginia General Assembly
- Quatannens v. Tyrrell (2004): the elements of adverse possession and possession by mistake Supreme Court of Virginia
- Land Use and Planning (subdivision of land) Carroll County, Virginia